Family Law & Family Violence

Connected proceedings

Family Law & Family Violence

Family violence issues can affect parenting arrangements, evidence, risk assessment and the practical conduct of separation and parenting proceedings.

One matter can cross several jurisdictions

The same factual circumstances may lead to an FVIO application in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, police investigation or criminal charges, and parenting proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

These are not one combined case. An FVIO is made under Victorian protective legislation. A criminal prosecution determines whether an offence is proved beyond reasonable doubt. A parenting case applies the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) to determine orders for a child. Each proceeding has its own purpose, statutory tests, evidence and procedure.

They can still affect one another. A condition about communication or proximity may change how parenting arrangements operate. Police material may become relevant to risk issues in a parenting case. Statements made in one proceeding may be examined in another. Coordinated advice is intended to identify those interactions without treating an allegation as an established fact.

The child’s best interests and safety

When making a parenting order, the Court must regard the child’s best interests as the paramount consideration. The parenting framework changed in May 2024. Current law requires the Court to consider matters including what arrangements promote the safety of the child and each person who has care of the child, including safety from being subjected or exposed to family violence, abuse, neglect or other harm.

The Court also considers the child’s views where relevant, the child’s developmental, psychological, emotional and cultural needs, each proposed carer’s capacity to meet those needs, the benefit of relationships with parents and significant people where safe, and anything else relevant to the child’s circumstances.

There is no automatic rule that an allegation produces a particular parenting outcome. The Court considers the evidence, risk and proposed arrangements. Equally, an allegation should not be dismissed merely because it has not resulted in a criminal conviction.

Family violence evidence and risk information

Material relevant to a parenting case may include an FVIO application or order, Family Violence Safety Notice, police statements or event information, criminal charges, medical records, messages, photographs, school or child-protection material and witness evidence. The relevance and admissibility of each item depend on the proceeding.

A person seeking parenting orders must inform the federal Court about relevant family violence orders. A Notice of child abuse, family violence or risk is required with specified parenting applications and responses. Current information-sharing provisions also enable the Court to obtain information from police and child-protection agencies in appropriate cases.

An FVIO may be relevant evidence, but its existence does not automatically determine every alleged fact. Orders can be interim, made by consent without admissions, or made after a contested hearing. The context in which the order was made can matter.

How FVIOs and parenting orders interact

The Magistrates’ Court makes Victorian intervention orders; the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia makes parenting orders under Commonwealth law. A person dealing with both should provide each court with the current orders from the other jurisdiction.

The interaction is legally nuanced. Federal family-law provisions address inconsistency between parenting orders and family violence orders, including the effect of later orders and powers available to courts in particular circumstances. It is unsafe to rely on a slogan such as “the parenting order always wins” without examining the wording, timing and statutory operation of both documents.

An FVIO does not automatically extinguish a parenting order. A parenting order does not automatically revoke an FVIO. If the orders appear inconsistent, obtain advice before acting and, where necessary, seek clarification or variation through the proper court process.

Communication, changeovers and time with children

Parenting arrangements may need to address communication channels, collection and return of children, changeover locations, third-party assistance, school events and access to information about the child. Where risk is alleged, proposals may include supervised time, professionally supervised changeovers, communication through a parenting app or a lawyer, or conditions limiting the subject matter and timing of messages.

The appropriate arrangement depends on the evidence and orders. A no-contact FVIO may contain an exception for communication permitted by a parenting order or for specified child-related purposes, but not every order does. Read the actual exception and do not expand it by assumption.

Contact initiated by the other parent does not itself amend an FVIO. Informal parenting arrangements also do not override court orders.

Urgent parenting proceedings

Some parenting issues require urgent consideration, including an immediate safety concern, the withholding or removal of a child, an impending relocation, or an arrangement that cannot operate because of new police or intervention-order conditions.

Urgency does not remove the need for evidence. A person seeking urgent orders may need to explain the recent event, existing arrangements, current risk, orders already in force and why ordinary listing timeframes are not adequate. The federal Court determines urgency and the interim arrangements it considers appropriate.

Family dispute resolution is commonly required before parenting proceedings, but exemptions may be available where there are reasonable grounds relating to family violence, child abuse or urgency. Whether an exemption applies should be assessed against the current law and facts.

Why coordinated advice matters

A proposed consent position in an FVIO case may affect communication or evidence in a parenting case. A parenting proposal may be impractical under current intervention-order conditions. A police interview may create material relevant in both jurisdictions. These consequences are easier to address before positions become fixed.

Read the FVIO cornerstone guide, information for people responding to an application, and the explanation of related criminal proceedings.

Bring all current parenting orders, FVIOs, safety notices, bail conditions and upcoming hearing dates to any conference. Advice based on one document alone may miss an operative restriction in another jurisdiction.

Clear next steps

Speak to The Family Violence Lawyer Now

Legal information on this website is general in nature. Advice about your circumstances can help you understand the proceeding, the proposed conditions and the options available.

Contact Us